Home > On-Demand Archives > Talks >
The Micro-Doppler Effect in Radar: Next Generation Remote Medical Applications
Nir Regev - Watch Now - DSP Online Conference 2022 - Duration: 24:42
This guide was created with the help of AI, based on the presentation's transcript. Its goal is to give you useful context and background so you can get the most out of the session.
What this presentation is about and why it matters
This talk introduces the micro-Doppler effect in radar and shows how micro-motions — such as breathing and heartbeats — appear in radar returns. The speaker explains the physical origin of these extra spectral components, sketches the key mathematics, and demonstrates real radar captures that extract respiration and heart rate from several meters away. For engineers working in DSP, sensors, or remote health monitoring, understanding micro-Doppler is useful because it connects signal models, spectral analysis, and practical system design: how waveform choice, sensing band, time–frequency resolution, array geometry and post-processing algorithms determine whether physiological signals can be detected and measured reliably.
Who will benefit the most from this presentation
- Radar and RF engineers who want to add physiological sensing or gesture recognition capabilities to existing sensors.
- Signal processing engineers and students learning applied spectral estimation, time–frequency tradeoffs, and model-based detection.
- Product engineers exploring non-contact vital-sign monitoring (baby monitors, elderly care, automotive occupant sensing).
- Researchers interested in micro-Doppler signatures for classification problems (drones, gait, gestures).
What you need to know
The talk assumes familiarity with basic radar and DSP concepts. Below are the compact items to review so you get the most out of the talk.
- Doppler basics: For a monostatic radar the Doppler frequency shift produced by a target moving with radial velocity $v_r$ is
$f_D = \dfrac{2\,v_r}{\lambda}$
where $\lambda$ is the carrier wavelength. This is the starting point for thinking about motion-induced phase changes. - Baseband I/Q and phase: After quadrature demodulation the return is a complex envelope $z(t)$ whose instantaneous phase is proportional to range. Small oscillatory changes in range map to phase modulation and produce spectral sidebands.
- Vibrating-target model: A simple model of a vibrating point scatterer is
$r(t)=R_0 + A_v\sin(\Omega_v t)$
where $A_v$ is vibration amplitude and $\Omega_v$ is the angular vibration frequency. The phase term in the baseband becomes an FM-like term and can be expanded into harmonics using Bessel functions; that expansion explains the spectral lines spaced at integer multiples of the vibration frequency, i.e. the micro-Doppler. - Harmonics and intermodulation: When two periodic motions coexist (e.g. respiration and heartbeat), the spectrum contains each fundamental and their harmonics, plus intermodulation products (sums and differences). Respiratory motion is low-frequency but large amplitude, heartbeats are higher-frequency but smaller amplitude — this amplitude separation plus hardware nonlinearity often creates dense spectral structure.
- Time–frequency resolution: Fourier-based estimators need sufficiently long time windows to resolve close frequencies. That creates the familiar tradeoff: higher spectral resolution vs. the ability to track time variations. The talk references algorithms (FFT, Chirp-Z, subspace methods like MUSIC) and shows how window length, sampling and aliasing affect what you can see.
- Practical considerations: Carrier band (24, 60, 77 GHz, etc.), CW vs pulsed waveforms, SNR, multipath, hardware nonlinearities and aliasing are all important. Array receivers add angular and spatial diversity, improving robustness and allowing multiple-person monitoring.
Glossary
- Doppler shift: Frequency change of the returned signal proportional to radial velocity.
- Micro-Doppler: Additional spectral components caused by small-scale vibrations or rotations superimposed on bulk motion.
- Radial velocity: Velocity component along the line-of-sight to the radar; it determines Doppler shift.
- Harmonic: Integer multiples of a fundamental frequency appearing in the spectrum due to nonlinear phase modulation.
- Intermodulation: Sum/difference frequencies produced when two or more periodic motions combine.
- CW radar: Continuous-wave radar that transmits a single continuous carrier; commonly used for micro-Doppler sensing.
- I/Q baseband: Complex representation of the demodulated radar return: in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) components.
- Range–Doppler map: A 2D display where one axis is range (from time/gating) and the other is Doppler frequency (from spectral analysis).
- MUSIC: A subspace-based spectral estimator that can resolve closely spaced sinusoids better than classical periodograms under certain conditions.
- Bessel expansion: Mathematical series used to express an FM-like exponential of a sinusoid; it explains why phase-modulated motion produces discrete spectral sidebands.
A few words about the presentation
Nir Regev’s talk balances theory and practice: he presents a clear physical model (vibrating-range → phase modulation → Bessel harmonics) and then validates it with straightforward, relatable demos (phone vibration, seated breathing and heart-rate capture). If you appreciate talks that tie mathematical intuition to real captures and system-level constraints (bands, resolution, clutter), you’ll find this one both useful and motivating. Expect concrete examples you can build on for research or prototyping of non-contact vital-sign monitoring.
Thank you for your questions!
Let me try to answer it:
(1) I don't know if BR or HR will be better estimated with a CW or FMCW, however, pure CW is not practical for real life situations, as it does not give you range information at all and hence, cannot separate target on the range axis. (e.g. application: elderly couple sleeping in bed).
(2) Yes, and there is already some work on the subject. see for example this work (there is more): http://sig.umd.edu/publications/mmHRV_Fengyu_2021.pdf
Thanks Dr. Regev for the nice talk. It was easy to follow as the content of the presentation is very interesting including the demos. The mathematical derivations for the vital signs based doppler effect was also very convenient to understand. I hope to learn from you in the future as well.
Faheem
Thank you Dr. Khan
It is my honor for you to come and hear my talk.
Please feel free to approach with any followup questions.
Kind regards
Nir Regev
https://www.linkedin.com/in/regevnir/
alephzero.ai
Nice presentation of material with simple explanation and demonstrations. Thank you.
Thank you Chris, it was my pleasure, feel free to approach any followup questions.
Kind regards
Nir Regev
https://www.linkedin.com/in/regevnir/
alephzero.ai

Hi Dr Nir Regev,
I attended the session on the offline recorded version as it's a different time zone for me. It's an bird's eye view of what's possible with Radar. Thanks for the presentation along with demo.
I have few questions: Based on your experience
1) Which one gives better estimate of BR & RR? Is it CW/FMCW? Could you please suggest any literature providing this comparison.
2) Is it possible to extract Heart Rate Variability using FMCW?